|
|
|
|
Artwork
Author: Doush
|
|
(Added on Feb 11, 2003)
(This month 82735 readers) (Total 136593 readers) |
|
A successful slaver has begun turning her slaves into functional pieces of furniture and extravagant pieces of art. When another prominent female slaver pays her a visit, triple-cross follows double-cross amidst bondage, torture and murder. |
Ratings and Reviews: |
Number
of Ratings: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
25% |
0% |
25% |
50% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?): (7.5/10) |
Average
Rating: (8/10) |
Highest
Rating: (9/10) |
Lowest
Rating: (6/10) |
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Moggy
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 17, 2003 |
|
(Jul 17) Up to chapter 5. Story progressing well. Highly readable. Nice bondage, but could be spiced up with more sex scenes. (Mar 23) Very enjoyable and a little different to the usual sex and violence. I like the light plot-driven writing style, which contains some delicious details. Doush is developing into a very fluent writer, in the mould of Leviticus, but perhaps with greater wit. One criticism: Whilst many will find the bondage scenarios a turn on, more sexual scenes would broaden the story's appeal. (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Emily
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 7, 2003 |
|
The slow buildup in this story is what is really turning me on. The suspense is great! (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
RTNYMaster
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 11, 2003 |
|
Fairly decent writing but a somewhat weak storyline. (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Lady Blade
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 11, 2003 |
|
I like this. Nice twists at the end of the first Chapter. Can't wait to see more of it. Definately has my interest. The only reason I could not give it a 10/10 was because there was some grammar in the beginning that was a little shaky. Once past that, however, very well done. Work a bit on your technical grammar and you definately have a winner. (9/10)
|
|
|