|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 9 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 33% |
11% |
11% |
11% |
0% |
0% |
11% |
22% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (4/10) |
| Average
Rating: (4/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (8/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (1/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Dryhill
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 30, 2011 |
| |
I like the idea of the story, except there is no proper ending. Mind you the story is so badly written as to be virtually unreadable, so it is probably a good thing the story was not any longer. (1/10)
|
| |
- Replied by:
Dryhill
(Edit) (Feb 5, 2012)
- For reasons not clear even to me, I re-read this story and have given it some more thought. While I still feel my original rating of a one is correct, I think that there is some promise to the idea behind the story but it does need completely re-writing and some more chapters added to make it into a good yarn.
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
C_Lakewood
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Aug 16, 2005 |
| |
How a couple of reviewers could give this mess
an 8 is utterly beyond me. Implausible, poorly
written, and essentially pointless. (1/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
jtman
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Feb 2, 2005 |
| |
The subject matter of this story is awesome, more installments please! (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Moggy
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 7, 2003 |
| |
Sorry Abraham, you're probably a great guy, but as a writer... this is the kind of submission the 1 point rating was made for. This piece needs a LOT of work. (1/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Bonif51
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 5, 2003 |
| |
Though admittedly, the story would have been better with the use of a spell-checker, punctuation and just plain proof-reading, this was still a very enjoyable story. I agree with "Woolfighter"; I hope the story continues. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
jbowler65
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 5, 2003 |
| |
this story was very poorly written it was difficult to read just about as difficult it is to read this review but there was a good idea somewhere in all the run on sentences and run on paragraphs and perhaps a good editior can fish them out otherwise it will be a difficult read. (2/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
lex ludite
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 5, 2003 |
| |
The author does a great job of shooting himself in the foot beginning with the opening paragraph which is littered with misspelled words, terrible punctuation,lack of proper capitalization and dialogue that truly deserves the word stilted. I don't think this one can be repaired unless the author brings in an editor and a fresh plot. I really don't mean to pile on, but this one breaks most of the rules of writing. (3/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Jacen
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 5, 2003 |
| |
Massive sentance-paragraphs that really should be divided into four or five sentances. Not a lot of content, and even less punctuation. Not worth wading through and translating. (4/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
woolfighter
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 3, 2003 |
| |
I like the idea and how you are degrading them. Go on. (8/10)
|
|
|
About 