|
|
|
|
2084
Author: Eve Adorer
|
|
(Added on Mar 29, 2005)
(This month 120377 readers) (Total 186213 readers) |
|
The Wall Street crash of 2029 saw ninety-five percent unemployment in Britain, and the consequent rise to power of the Phallus Party under Adele Halter. Halter's cure for economic decline and overpopulation, was to deny women and girls the right to return to career basis employment. By 2084, unless they were wealthy or had an original entrepreneurial idea for which they could get backing, only girlual labour, salesgirl, and truckess jobs remained open to women, and even these would be excluded them in time. Unpopular at first, and known to have been lubricated by corruption, the policy had nonetheless worked, and Halter had thus won six successive ten-year terms of office. By 2084, even a girl as intellectually gifted as Amanda Heavensent could find no other job than that of temporary waitress at a roadside restaurant ... |
Ratings and Reviews: |
Number
of Ratings: 10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
10% |
10% |
20% |
50% |
10% |
|
Weighed
Average (?): (8.5/10) |
Average
Rating: (8.5/10) |
Highest
Rating: (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating: (6/10) |
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Samantha
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Sep 19, 2005 |
|
Love the concepts. Love the ideas. I did find myself having to work very hard to grasp, understand and picture some of the scenes desribed especially when Eva Adorer made such a prolific use of adjectives, which were combined to form quite long sentences that seemed to be almost never ending. However, having said that, there were many sections of the story where this style of writing worked extremely well. Reading such a unique style of writing was, I must say, a delightful experience. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
JimmyJump
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 13, 2005 |
|
It is seldom one comes accross a story that is so wholly well-written and alternating aliterating aliterations all to the all-over delight of the readers altogether... Though on must be in the mood for the aliterations, as they sometimes tend to clog-up the fluency in reading, forcing one to restart some sentences from the start with a start for being able to comprehend what hithertho was incomprehensible... Love(d) this story with tremendous enormity... Thank you very much, Eve Adorer JJ (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Jacen
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 9, 2005 |
|
The story is a bit hit-or-miss, parts are well written and delightful (if a bit obscure) and parts are just bizzare, with sentances like 'the hint of a hint of a hint of a hint of bicep, from her weightlifting to keep herself trim: just the hint of a hint of a hint of a hint,' That's EIGHT hints... sheesh. (8/10)
|
|
- Replied by:
Eve Adorer
(Edit) (Oct 6, 2006)
- I take the hint and deserve the hit. You're right - eight times over! That passage was either bad or worse: I'm not sure which!
Thanks for the positive review though!! EA
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
pejanon
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jul 6, 2005 |
|
Very rewarding, if exasperating reading. A looong prose poem of, ahem, adoration. Some of it is just beautiful (Imogene and hair short piece or caning of Amanda and Rossetta come to mind), some isn't, and sometimes heaping of heaps of adjectives on heaping heap is just overdoing it. The effort to keep it up seems to wear down the author - then it becomes redundant and/or too contrived. However that is more than compensated by real attempt to mach style with contents (and author's feelings about it), delight in language itself and wordplay (girlacles, right!) Experimental writing is so rare in erotica (if one does not take variations of spelling of aaarrgghhh! as experimental). Actually this is very good SF-smut novel (novella, novelette? what it'll be?). Skillfully guided, well planned, inventive, witty and soooo juicy. The scenes are too longishly long (this is contagious!) but ...Give me Amanda Heavensent anytime! (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Dancing Hateful Thin
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 22, 2005 |
|
You know, I'm pretty sure that I made a mistake the first time that I reviewed one of Eve Adorer's story. I was kinda honked off about the linguistic tricks that she uses, but after a while, you stop reading it as a straight story and start reading it instead as a sort of lengthy prose poem. And, on that basis, it's actually pretty darn good. (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 20, 2005 |
|
how i never say this great story before is beyond me (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
La Toya
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 13, 2005 |
|
The story idea is good. I way lost a couple times. I reread it and found i was getting lost with the time line. 4/13/05 This is becoming a very good story. I look forward to more. Rating increased. (7/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
woolfighter
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 7, 2005 |
|
Amazing. Even logically any girl in Eve's world would know her fate, Eve made us believe they feel humiliated to the utmost. Hot, hotter, Eve_adorer (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
lex ludite
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Apr 1, 2005 |
|
Eve Adorer is an acquired taste, and I must confess that I'm addicted to the breathless girlish style of writing that Eve uses as the vehicle for the outrageous travails that befall these awesomely intelligent and utterly gorgeous ultra feminine creations that populate these stories. There is over the top and beyond that there is Eve Adorer. I have watched this writer develop some very sophisticated plot lines that are well above what the typical scribblers posting here provide.This story is no exception. One other thing that Eve can do is generate heat, incredible amounts of volcanic incandescent heat! This is another attribute that puts this writer into a very special category as far as this reader is concerned. My compliments to the author for another thrill ride that hopefully will last for at least another dozen chapters or so. Brava, or is it bravo? (9/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
LordVetinari
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Mar 31, 2005 |
|
An interesting idea, but I found the writing style overly florid and more than occasionally difficult to get through. However, the end of part three made it well worthwhile. (6/10)
|
|
- Replied by:
Eve Adorer
(Edit) (Oct 6, 2006)
- Thanks for the review. Sorry it was not more to your taste. I write for fun. Not to play with words would spoil my fun. I'm afraid that means 'take it or leave it' where what I scrawl is concerned. Glad you didn't decide to abandon it altogether though! Thanks again...
EA
|
|
|