|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 7 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 14% |
0% |
0% |
57% |
14% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
14% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (5/10) |
| Average
Rating: (5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (1/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
elecutrix
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Sep 30, 2006 |
| |
Great story (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jun 4, 2006 |
| |
my rating is based on not knowing if the new owner of the site messed up the posting or the story is just simply bad, as mentioned by others, the 1st part is posted twice, the first part is way to short and offers nothing, i am giving it a 5 hopingthat most of the problem is the wreb site, if the site posted it as it is, then i would adjust my rating to a 3 at best (5/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
H Dean
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 25, 2005 |
| |
The writing was clear and concise. I didn't really notice any major grammatical mistakes but this is the best thing I can say about this story. Most unfortunately, I wondered, immediately, why a device would be needed to remove the clothing of a prison inmate when the clothing could be removed by hand. It seemed rather dumb to create an expensive machine that would strip and measure prison inmates. What's the point? (4/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
kemosabe
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 24, 2005 |
| |
a 4 is pretty generous, considering a 15 year old could read this and not get excited. I'm not sure if there is any reason to continue with this saga. (4/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
C_Lakewood
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 24, 2005 |
| |
Note: This rating is subject to change, if I
ever get a chance to read the story. Chapter 1
is listed twice, but none of the text appears either place for me. I assume this is more
bungling by the new owners of the site. The
transition has not exactly been seamless, has
it? (1/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Engineer
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 23, 2005 |
| |
Not very exciting. Too bureaucratic in style, without highlights or actual fascination. (4/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
La Toya
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 23, 2005 |
| |
I found it just so- so (4/10)
|
|
|
About 